AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get everyday helpers delivered free with Prime

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
  • Member-only deals all year
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

A University of Michigan study estimates that U.S. women can expect to spend seven years of their lives caring for older family members or friends, compared with four years for men. The gender gap was found across several caregiving relationships and tasks, but not care for a spouse or partner.

A new University of Michigan study estimates that women in the United States can expect to spend seven years of their lives caring for older adults, up from six years in 2011. The comparable estimate for men remained at four years, leaving a three-year gap in 2023 as millions of families rely on unpaid support for older relatives and friends.

The estimates come from research by Vicki Freedman and Crystal Yee To Ng, published in The Journals of Gerontology, Series B. The researchers analyzed nearly 8,500 responses to the National Study of Caregiving alongside federal population data to estimate lifetime caregiving for U.S. adults aged 20 and older. Their calculations describe the expected number of years spent helping older adults if current caregiving rates continue into the future; they are not a count of years already provided by each person.

The study found that the overall gender difference did not extend to care for a spouse or partner. Women and men were each estimated to spend about 1.5 years of their lives in that role. For other relationships, women were expected to provide more care: more than an additional year for a parent, several extra months for a grandparent, and more than an additional year for extended family and friends.

The difference also appeared across types of assistance, according to Freedman. Caregiving in the study includes tasks such as personal care, household chores, transportation and medical support. The researchers said women could expect to spend more years providing each kind of help, from bathing or dressing an older person to giving rides.

At a glance
reportWhen: Study published in 2026; estimates comp…
The developmentA study published in The Journals of Gerontology estimates that women’s lifetime caregiving for older adults rose from six years in 2011 to seven in 2023, while men’s estimate remained at four years.

How the Caregiving Gap Affects Families

The findings point to an unequal distribution of unpaid support at a time when the number of people caring for older adults is growing. Family members and friends often help with everyday activities that enable older adults to manage daily life. When women are expected to spend more years providing that support, the responsibility may shape how families divide time and care duties over a lifetime.

The research also has implications beyond immediate relatives. The report notes that more older Americans are living without close family, while care needs increase among people reaching later life. If fewer close relatives are available, support from friends, extended family or paid services may become more important. The study does not measure the effect on caregivers’ employment, finances or health, but its lifetime estimates show how long the demands may extend.

Amazon

adult care assistance products

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

From One-Time Counts to Lifetime Estimates

Many earlier studies have measured caregiving over a short period, such as a few months. The Michigan researchers instead used information across age groups to estimate how caregiving accumulates over a lifetime. Freedman described the method as a demographic calculation of how many years a person might provide care if current rates continue. The result offers a broader view than a snapshot, but it remains an estimate based on the rates and population data used.

The study also places the gender gap alongside a larger rise in family caregiving. The source report says the number of family caregivers assisting U.S. adults aged 65 and older increased from 18 million in 2011 to more than 24 million in recent years. Those figures describe the number of caregivers, while the seven- and four-year estimates describe expected lifetime duration; they are different measures.

“Despite attention to the growing number of men taking on caregiving responsibilities, the gap in lifetime family caregiving has not closed between men and women in recent years.”

— Vicki Freedman, research professor at the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research

What the Lifetime Estimates Cannot Show

The figures are projections from observed rates, not guarantees of how much care any individual will provide. The researchers frame them on the assumption that current rates hold into the future, and caregiving patterns could change as family structures, paid-care availability and social norms shift. The report does not specify how much each factor might alter the estimates.

The findings establish a difference in estimated lifetime caregiving, but the supplied study summary does not quantify how that time affects caregivers’ income, work, health or other responsibilities. It also does not establish why the gap persists. Those questions require evidence beyond the estimates described in the report.

Factors That Could Shift Future Care

The study does not announce a policy change or a new caregiving program. Its next implication is the need to track how the estimates develop as the population ages and family networks change. Researchers say the availability and affordability of paid care, changes in family composition and social expectations may influence who takes on support in coming years.

For now, the published comparison provides a baseline: women’s estimated lifetime care rose between 2011 and 2023, while men’s remained steady. Future data will show whether the gap continues, changes or narrows as care needs and sources of support evolve.

Key Questions

How many years of caregiving do women and men expect to provide?

The study estimates seven years for women and four years for men over their lifetimes, based on 2023 rates and the assumption that current rates continue.

Did the study find a gender gap in care for spouses?

No. Women and men were each estimated to spend about 1.5 years caring for a spouse or partner. The differences appeared in other relationships, including care for parents, grandparents, extended family and friends.

What tasks did the researchers count as caregiving?

The report includes help with personal care, household chores, transportation and medical tasks, among other support for older adults.

How did researchers calculate lifetime caregiving?

Researchers analyzed nearly 8,500 National Study of Caregiving responses with federal population data. They combined information across age groups to estimate lifetime years of care if current rates continue.

Why might future caregiving patterns change?

The researchers point to changes in family networks, the availability and affordability of paid care, and social norms. The study does not predict how those factors will affect the estimates.

Source: rss

This article is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional about your specific situation.
HALLOWEEN

Halloween Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

apple pay down

Apple Pay users report widespread outages; service appears to be down across the US, affecting transactions and wallet access.

Chemical Tank Explosion In Ohio Forces Evacuations As City Allows Plume To Vent

A leaking tank in Toledo released a chemical plume, prompting evacuations and a shelter-in-place order while officials monitor air quality.

Firefox 153 Available With Support For Vulkan Video Decoding, JPEG-XL

Mozilla releases Firefox 153, adding Vulkan-based video decoding and JPEG-XL image format support, enhancing performance and efficiency.

‘Tech Is Not Good Or Bad, But Neither Is It Neutral’: What We Heard This Week

MedPage Today’s October 18 roundup features comments on AI in healthcare, an mRNA flu shot, pregnancy research and other medical findings.